FCC Consumer Complaints – 1 October 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 1281 consumer complaints on Thursday, 1 October 2015 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 1256 complaints the day before. The complaints came from 52 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1281
States & territories reporting
52
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (442)
Most reported state/territory
California (135)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 1 October 2015 show 1281 complaints originating from 854 cities across 52 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 135 10.5%
Florida 112 8.7%
Texas 69 5.4%
Maryland 65 5.1%
Georgia 64 5.0%
New York 60 4.7%
Illinois 58 4.5%
Michigan 53 4.1%
Pennsylvania 43 3.4%
Ohio 41 3.2%
Other states and territories 577 45.0%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 924 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 924 72.1%
Internet 194 15.1%
TV 99 7.7%
Radio 57 4.4%
Accessibility 4 0.3%
Emergency 3 0.2%

Phone complaints

924 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 72.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 442 47.8%
Robocalls 235 25.4%
Billing 101 10.9%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 33 3.6%
Availability (including rural call completion) 29 3.1%
Privacy 29 3.1%
Junk Faxes 19 2.1%
Equipment 16 1.7%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 13 1.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 4 0.4%
Interference (including signal jammers) 3 0.3%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

194 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 63 32.5%
Availability 38 19.6%
Speed 28 14.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 25 12.9%
Privacy 20 10.3%
Interference 12 6.2%
Equipment 8 4.1%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

99 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 7.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 48 48.5%
Equipment 18 18.2%
Availability 12 12.1%
Indecency 8 8.1%
Interference 8 8.1%
Loud Commercials 4 4.0%
Privacy 1 1.0%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Equipment, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Radio complaints

57 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 4.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 44 77.2%
Indecency 4 7.0%
Availability 3 5.3%
Commercials/Promotions 2 3.5%
Pirate Radio 2 3.5%
Billing 1 1.8%
Equipment 1 1.8%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 1 October 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.