FCC Consumer Complaints – 23 October 2015

Introduction

On 23 October 2015, 1197 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented a decline from the 1250 complaints recorded the previous day. Complaints were reported across 50 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1197
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (434)
Most reported state/territory
California (148)

Where the complaints came from

The 1197 complaints recorded on 23 October 2015 originated from 739 cities across 50 states and territories. Complaint reports were spread across multiple states and territories, without any one location accounting for a large share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Iowa, where Iowa City accounted for 30 of the 30 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 148 12.4%
Florida 104 8.7%
Texas 72 6.0%
New York 70 5.8%
Maryland 69 5.8%
Georgia 62 5.2%
Pennsylvania 47 3.9%
Michigan 39 3.3%
Ohio 37 3.1%
New Jersey 36 3.0%
Other states and territories 508 42.4%

Location highlights

  • All complaints reported in Iowa originated from a single city, Iowa City.
  • Iowa City accounted for nearly all complaints recorded in Iowa.

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 6 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 886 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 886 74.0%
Internet 169 14.1%
TV 90 7.5%
Radio 48 4.0%
Emergency 3 0.3%
Accessibility 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

886 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 74.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 434 49.0%
Robocalls 227 25.6%
Billing 96 10.8%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 28 3.2%
Availability (including rural call completion) 27 3.0%
Equipment 24 2.7%
Privacy 22 2.5%
Junk Faxes 14 1.6%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 11 1.2%
Interference (including signal jammers) 3 0.3%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

169 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 56 33.1%
Availability 33 19.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 22 13.0%
Speed 20 11.8%
Privacy 16 9.5%
Interference 12 7.1%
Equipment 10 5.9%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Open Internet/Net Neutrality.

TV complaints

90 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 7.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 35 38.9%
Equipment 13 14.4%
Availability 11 12.2%
Loud Commercials 11 12.2%
Indecency 8 8.9%
Interference 6 6.7%
Privacy 4 4.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 2.2%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Equipment and Availability.

Radio complaints

48 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 4.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 39 81.3%
Indecency 4 8.3%
Commercials/Promotions 3 6.3%
Availability 1 2.1%
Pirate Radio 1 2.1%

Interference and Indecency were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 23 October 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.