FCC Consumer Complaints – 8 January 2016

Introduction

On 8 January 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 1055 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume fell from 1093 complaints the previous day. The complaints came from 50 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was the most frequently reported issue, with 345 complaints recorded.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1055
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (345)
Most reported state/territory
California (132)

Where the complaints came from

The 1055 complaints recorded on 8 January 2016 originated from 712 cities across 50 states and territories. Activity was spread across states and territories, with no single location accounting for a substantial share of complaints. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 132 12.5%
Florida 73 6.9%
Texas 62 5.9%
New York 61 5.8%
Virginia 51 4.8%
Tennessee 47 4.5%
Illinois 42 4.0%
Georgia 39 3.7%
Maryland 37 3.5%
Colorado 34 3.2%
Other states and territories 468 44.4%

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 747 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 747 70.8%
Internet 152 14.4%
TV 120 11.4%
Radio 32 3.0%
Accessibility 2 0.2%
Emergency 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

747 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 70.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 345 46.2%
Robocalls 171 22.9%
Billing 78 10.4%
Availability (including rural call completion) 33 4.4%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 30 4.0%
Privacy 24 3.2%
Equipment 23 3.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 14 1.9%
Junk Faxes 14 1.9%
Interference (including signal jammers) 7 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 6 0.8%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.3%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

152 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 37 24.3%
Billing 35 23.0%
Availability 27 17.8%
Speed 22 14.5%
Privacy 16 10.5%
Equipment 8 5.3%
Interference 7 4.6%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Open Internet/Net Neutrality, Billing and Availability.

TV complaints

120 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 52 43.3%
Availability 27 22.5%
Equipment 13 10.8%
Loud Commercials 12 10.0%
Indecency 8 6.7%
Interference 6 5.0%
Privacy 2 1.7%

Billing and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Radio complaints

32 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 3.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 17 53.1%
Availability 6 18.8%
Indecency 6 18.8%
Commercials/Promotions 2 6.3%
Billing 1 3.1%

Interference and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 8 January 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.