FCC Consumer Complaints – 3 March 2016

Introduction

A total of 1100 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday, 3 March 2016, complaint volume fell from 1127 complaints the previous day. The complaints came from 51 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1100
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (410)
Most reported state/territory
California (150)

Where the complaints came from

A total of 1100 complaints were recorded on 3 March 2016, with reports originating from 713 cities in 51 states and territories. Activity was spread across states and territories, with no single location accounting for a substantial share of complaints. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in Iowa, where Iowa City accounted for 28 of the 32 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 150 13.6%
Texas 85 7.7%
Florida 72 6.5%
New York 50 4.5%
Virginia 45 4.1%
Pennsylvania 43 3.9%
Georgia 38 3.5%
Illinois 38 3.5%
North Carolina 38 3.5%
Maryland 34 3.1%
Other states and territories 504 45.8%

Location highlights

  • Complaints in Iowa were heavily concentrated in Iowa City, which accounted for the majority of reports within the state.
  • Complaints in California were reported across 88 cities, the widest spread observed on this date.

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 5 different complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 868 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 868 78.9%
Internet 123 11.2%
TV 83 7.5%
Radio 24 2.2%
Accessibility 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

868 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 78.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 410 47.2%
Robocalls 249 28.7%
Billing 77 8.9%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 39 4.5%
Privacy 24 2.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 21 2.4%
Equipment 19 2.2%
Junk Faxes 12 1.4%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 7 0.8%
Interference (including signal jammers) 6 0.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 4 0.5%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

123 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 48 39.0%
Availability 27 22.0%
Privacy 14 11.4%
Speed 14 11.4%
Interference 8 6.5%
Equipment 6 4.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 6 4.9%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

TV complaints

83 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 7.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 43 51.8%
Availability 12 14.5%
Indecency 11 13.3%
Equipment 8 9.6%
Interference 4 4.8%
Loud Commercials 3 3.6%
Privacy 1 1.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 3 March 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.