FCC Consumer Complaints – 15 March 2016

Introduction

On 15 March 2016, 637 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented an increase from the 473 complaints recorded the previous day. Complaints were reported across 48 states and territories, and California generated the highest number of submissions with 90 complaints. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
637
States & territories reporting
48
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (189)
Most reported state/territory
California (90)

Where the complaints came from

On 15 March 2016, the 637 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 481 cities across 48 states and territories. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 90 14.1%
Florida 41 6.4%
New York 40 6.3%
Texas 36 5.7%
Pennsylvania 31 4.9%
Georgia 29 4.6%
Maryland 27 4.2%
Virginia 24 3.8%
Washington 22 3.5%
New Jersey 21 3.3%
Other states and territories 267 41.9%

Location highlight

Complaints in California were reported across 70 cities, the widest spread observed on this date.

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 464 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 464 72.8%
Internet 100 15.7%
TV 55 8.6%
Radio 14 2.2%
Accessibility 2 0.3%
Request for Dispute Assistance 2 0.3%

Phone complaints

464 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 72.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 189 40.7%
Robocalls 91 19.6%
Billing 86 18.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 20 4.3%
Equipment 17 3.7%
Availability (including rural call completion) 15 3.2%
Privacy 15 3.2%
Junk Faxes 13 2.8%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 11 2.4%
Interference (including signal jammers) 3 0.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 0.6%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.2%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

100 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 32 32.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 19 19.0%
Availability 18 18.0%
Speed 10 10.0%
Interference 8 8.0%
Equipment 7 7.0%
Privacy 6 6.0%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Open Internet/Net Neutrality and Availability.

TV complaints

55 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 8.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 26 47.3%
Availability 11 20.0%
Indecency 5 9.1%
Interference 5 9.1%
Loud Commercials 5 9.1%
Equipment 3 5.5%

Billing and Availability accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 15 March 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.