FCC Consumer Complaints – 16 April 2016

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 523 consumer complaints on 16 April 2016 relating to telecommunications services, this was lower than the 1163 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 44 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
523
States & territories reporting
44
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (106)
Most reported state/territory
California (82)

Where the complaints came from

On 16 April 2016, the 523 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 358 cities across 44 states and territories. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 82 15.7%
Florida 69 13.2%
Texas 65 12.4%
New York 27 5.2%
Georgia 24 4.6%
Pennsylvania 19 3.6%
Washington 19 3.6%
Maryland 17 3.3%
Michigan 17 3.3%
Ohio 15 2.9%
Other states and territories 169 32.3%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 272 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 272 52.0%
Internet 117 22.4%
TV 96 18.4%
Radio 35 6.7%
Emergency 2 0.4%
Accessibility 1 0.2%

Phone complaints

272 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 52.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 106 39.0%
Robocalls 64 23.5%
Equipment 29 10.7%
Billing 28 10.3%
Privacy 14 5.1%
Availability (including rural call completion) 12 4.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 6 2.2%
Junk Faxes 5 1.8%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 3 1.1%
Interference (including signal jammers) 3 1.1%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 2 0.7%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

117 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 22.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 46 39.3%
Billing 26 22.2%
Speed 14 12.0%
Equipment 10 8.5%
Privacy 8 6.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 7 6.0%
Interference 6 5.1%

Availability and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

TV complaints

96 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 18.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 34 35.4%
Billing 26 27.1%
Equipment 11 11.5%
Interference 10 10.4%
Loud Commercials 8 8.3%
Indecency 4 4.2%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 2.1%
Privacy 1 1.0%

Availability and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Radio complaints

35 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 6.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 19 54.3%
Indecency 11 31.4%
Availability 2 5.7%
Commercials/Promotions 1 2.9%
Equipment 1 2.9%
Pirate Radio 1 2.9%

Interference and Indecency accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 16 April 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.