FCC Consumer Complaints – 19 April 2016

Introduction

A total of 1319 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday, 19 April 2016, this was higher than the 1074 complaints recorded the previous day. The complaints came from 50 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1319
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (395)
Most reported state/territory
California (181)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 19 April 2016 show 1319 complaints originating from 812 cities across 50 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 181 13.7%
Florida 160 12.1%
Texas 107 8.1%
Maryland 65 4.9%
New York 63 4.8%
Pennsylvania 50 3.8%
Georgia 41 3.1%
Illinois 39 3.0%
North Carolina 39 3.0%
New Jersey 35 2.7%
Other states and territories 533 40.4%

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 919 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 919 69.7%
Internet 197 14.9%
TV 148 11.2%
Radio 51 3.9%
Accessibility 2 0.2%
Emergency 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

919 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 69.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 395 43.0%
Robocalls 196 21.3%
Billing 119 12.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 56 6.1%
Equipment 38 4.1%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 35 3.8%
Junk Faxes 33 3.6%
Privacy 27 2.9%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 11 1.2%
Interference (including signal jammers) 6 0.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 0.3%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

197 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 72 36.5%
Billing 53 26.9%
Privacy 20 10.2%
Speed 20 10.2%
Equipment 12 6.1%
Interference 12 6.1%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 7 3.6%

Availability and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

TV complaints

148 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 60 40.5%
Availability 49 33.1%
Equipment 20 13.5%
Interference 6 4.1%
Loud Commercials 5 3.4%
Indecency 4 2.7%
Privacy 3 2.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.7%

Billing and Availability accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Radio complaints

51 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 3.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 41 80.4%
Billing 3 5.9%
Commercials/Promotions 3 5.9%
Indecency 3 5.9%
Availability 1 2.0%

Interference and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 19 April 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.