FCC Consumer Complaints – 10 August 2016

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 1243 consumer complaints on 10 August 2016 relating to telecommunications services, this represented a decline from the 1258 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 51 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1243
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (415)
Most reported state/territory
California (160)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 10 August 2016 show 1243 complaints originating from 774 cities across 51 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 160 12.9%
Florida 113 9.1%
Texas 99 8.0%
New York 69 5.6%
Pennsylvania 61 4.9%
Maryland 53 4.3%
Illinois 49 3.9%
Ohio 46 3.7%
Georgia 44 3.5%
North Carolina 38 3.1%
Other states and territories 510 41.0%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 915 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 915 73.6%
Internet 160 12.9%
TV 127 10.2%
Radio 33 2.7%
Emergency 5 0.4%
Accessibility 3 0.2%

Phone complaints

915 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 73.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 415 45.4%
Robocalls 266 29.1%
Billing 86 9.4%
Privacy 36 3.9%
Equipment 33 3.6%
Availability (including rural call completion) 32 3.5%
Junk Faxes 16 1.7%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 11 1.2%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 9 1.0%
Interference (including signal jammers) 9 1.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 0.2%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

160 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 12.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 49 30.6%
Availability 37 23.1%
Speed 24 15.0%
Privacy 20 12.5%
Interference 11 6.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 11 6.9%
Equipment 8 5.0%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

127 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 10.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 51 40.2%
Availability 37 29.1%
Indecency 13 10.2%
Equipment 10 7.9%
Interference 8 6.3%
Privacy 4 3.1%
Loud Commercials 3 2.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.8%

Billing and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Radio complaints

33 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 2.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 25 75.8%
Availability 2 6.1%
Commercials/Promotions 2 6.1%
Billing 1 3.0%
Equipment 1 3.0%
Indecency 1 3.0%
Pirate Radio 1 3.0%

Interference and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 10 August 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.