FCC Consumer Complaints – 18 September 2016

Introduction

A total of 494 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on 18 September 2016, this represented a decline from the 667 complaints recorded the day before. The complaints came from 45 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. The most common issue reported was Billing, accounting for 184 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
494
States & territories reporting
45
Most common issue
Billing (184)
Most reported state/territory
California (52)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 18 September 2016 show 494 complaints originating from 387 cities across 45 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Maryland, where Frederick accounted for 29 of the 41 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 52 10.5%
Maryland 41 8.3%
Ohio 35 7.1%
Pennsylvania 33 6.7%
Florida 32 6.5%
Texas 30 6.1%
Michigan 21 4.3%
Virginia 20 4.0%
Georgia 18 3.6%
Illinois 17 3.4%
Other states and territories 195 39.5%

Location highlight

A large share of complaints in Maryland originated from Frederick, which accounted for most reports within the state.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 4 complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 286 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 286 57.9%
Internet 97 19.6%
TV 76 15.4%
Radio 35 7.1%

Phone complaints

286 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 57.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 128 44.8%
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 51 17.8%
Robocalls 32 11.2%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 18 6.3%
Equipment 17 5.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 12 4.2%
Privacy 10 3.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 8 2.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 5 1.7%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 4 1.4%
Junk Faxes 1 0.3%

Billing and Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

97 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 19.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 37 38.1%
Speed 20 20.6%
Availability 13 13.4%
Privacy 10 10.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 8 8.2%
Interference 7 7.2%
Equipment 2 2.1%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Speed and Availability.

TV complaints

76 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 18 23.7%
Loud Commercials 15 19.7%
Indecency 14 18.4%
Availability 13 17.1%
Interference 8 10.5%
Equipment 7 9.2%
Privacy 1 1.3%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Loud Commercials and Indecency.

Radio complaints

35 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 7.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 29 82.9%
Commercials/Promotions 2 5.7%
Billing 1 2.9%
Equipment 1 2.9%
Indecency 1 2.9%
Pirate Radio 1 2.9%

Interference and Commercials/Promotions were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 18 September 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.