FCC Consumer Complaints – 6 December 2020

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 433 consumer complaints on 6 December 2020 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume fell from 572 complaints the day before. The complaints came from 46 states and territories, with Texas reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Unwanted Calls was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
433
States & territories reporting
46
Most common issue
Unwanted Calls (172)
Most reported state/territory
Texas (44)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 6 December 2020 show 433 complaints originating from 324 cities across 46 states and territories. Complaint reports were spread across multiple states and territories, without any one location accounting for a large share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
Texas 44 10.2%
Florida 31 7.2%
California 30 6.9%
New York 29 6.7%
Pennsylvania 20 4.6%
Illinois 17 3.9%
Ohio 17 3.9%
North Carolina 16 3.7%
Virginia 15 3.5%
Indiana 14 3.2%
Other states and territories 200 46.2%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 5 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 221 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 221 51.0%
TV 139 32.1%
Internet 67 15.5%
Radio 5 1.2%
Accessibility 1 0.2%

Phone complaints

221 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 51.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 172 77.8%
Billing 16 7.2%
Availability (including rural call completion) 13 5.9%
Equipment 9 4.1%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 5 2.3%
Interference (including signal jammers) 3 1.4%
Privacy 3 1.4%

Unwanted calls again accounted for the largest share of complaints in this category. These reports are examined in more detail in the section below. Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability (including rural call completion) and Equipment.

TV complaints

139 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 32.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 95 68.3%
Billing 19 13.7%
Loud Commercials 17 12.2%
Interference 5 3.6%
Indecency 2 1.4%
Equipment 1 0.7%

Availability and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

67 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 23 34.3%
Billing 21 31.3%
Interference 13 19.4%
Speed 4 6.0%
Equipment 3 4.5%
Privacy 3 4.5%

Availability and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Unwanted calls

A total of 172 complaints relating to unwanted calls were recorded on this date, representing 39.7% of all complaints. Caller ID and business contact numbers are shown below where sufficient data is available.

Most reported business contact numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(315) 232-8257 19 11.0%
(754) 333-0001 4 2.3%
(202) 641-1289 1 0.6%
(202) 888-1488 1 0.6%
(202) 929-3739 1 0.6%
(202) 964-9532 1 0.6%
(216) 304-1943 1 0.6%
(216) 867-4815 1 0.6%
(254) 388-0257 1 0.6%
(260) 589-7532 1 0.6%

Key patterns

  • Abandoned Calls was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • (315) 232-8257 stood out as the most frequently reported business contact number.
  • Reports were spread across many different caller ID numbers, with no single number dominating.
Page last updated: 7 December 2020 with FCC complaints data from 6 December 2020.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.