FCC Consumer Complaints – 19 May 2015

Introduction

On 19 May 2015, 999 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented an increase from the 857 complaints recorded the day before. Submissions were made from 51 states and territories, with California accounting for the highest number of complaints at 136. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was the most frequently reported issue, with 409 complaints recorded.

Key statistics

Total complaints
999
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (409)
Most reported state/territory
California (136)

Where the complaints came from

A total of 999 complaints were recorded on 19 May 2015, with reports originating from 639 cities in 51 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Minnesota, where Hills accounted for 38 of the 56 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 136 13.6%
Florida 67 6.7%
Texas 65 6.5%
Minnesota 56 5.6%
New York 55 5.5%
Illinois 50 5.0%
Pennsylvania 45 4.5%
Georgia 38 3.8%
North Carolina 33 3.3%
Ohio 32 3.2%
Other states and territories 422 42.2%

Location highlight

Complaints in Minnesota were heavily concentrated in Hills, which accounted for the majority of reports within the state.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 5 complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 792 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 792 79.3%
TV 97 9.7%
Internet 88 8.8%
Radio 17 1.7%
Accessibility 5 0.5%

Phone complaints

792 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 79.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 409 51.6%
Robocalls 169 21.3%
Billing 61 7.7%
Availability (including rural call completion) 60 7.6%
Equipment 23 2.9%
Junk Faxes 21 2.7%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 15 1.9%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 15 1.9%
Privacy 10 1.3%
Interference (including signal jammers) 8 1.0%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.1%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

TV complaints

97 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 9.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 34 35.1%
Indecency 20 20.6%
Availability 16 16.5%
Equipment 11 11.3%
Loud Commercials 7 7.2%
Interference 6 6.2%
Privacy 3 3.1%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Indecency and Availability.

Internet complaints

88 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 8.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 28 31.8%
Privacy 20 22.7%
Availability 17 19.3%
Speed 10 11.4%
Interference 7 8.0%
Equipment 6 6.8%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Privacy and Availability.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 19 May 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.