FCC Consumer Complaints – 29 July 2015

Introduction

On 29 July 2015, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 1375 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, this was higher than the 1359 complaints recorded the previous day. Complaints were reported across 52 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. The largest number of complaints related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), with 558 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1375
States & territories reporting
52
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (558)
Most reported state/territory
California (134)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 29 July 2015 show 1375 complaints originating from 902 cities across 52 states and territories. The complaints were widely dispersed, with no single state or territory representing a notable proportion of the total. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 134 9.7%
Florida 98 7.1%
Texas 89 6.5%
Pennsylvania 74 5.4%
New York 67 4.9%
Illinois 64 4.7%
Georgia 59 4.3%
Maryland 53 3.9%
Ohio 51 3.7%
Virginia 48 3.5%
Other states and territories 632 46.0%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 1035 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 1035 75.3%
Internet 189 13.7%
TV 110 8.0%
Radio 37 2.7%
Emergency 2 0.1%
Accessibility 1 0.1%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

1035 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 75.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 558 53.9%
Robocalls 237 22.9%
Billing 86 8.3%
Availability (including rural call completion) 38 3.7%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 22 2.1%
Equipment 21 2.0%
Junk Faxes 18 1.7%
Privacy 14 1.4%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 13 1.3%
Interference (including signal jammers) 11 1.1%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 11 1.1%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

189 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 13.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 47 24.9%
Availability 45 23.8%
Speed 32 16.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 19 10.1%
Interference 17 9.0%
Privacy 17 9.0%
Equipment 12 6.3%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

110 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 8.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 52 47.3%
Equipment 15 13.6%
Availability 13 11.8%
Loud Commercials 13 11.8%
Indecency 9 8.2%
Interference 5 4.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 1.8%
Privacy 1 0.9%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Equipment, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Radio complaints

37 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 2.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 24 64.9%
Indecency 5 13.5%
Pirate Radio 4 10.8%
Equipment 2 5.4%
Availability 1 2.7%
Billing 1 2.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 29 July 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.