FCC Consumer Complaints – 17 September 2015

Introduction

On 17 September 2015, 1432 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented an increase from the 1258 complaints recorded the day before. Reports were received from 52 states and territories, with California recording slightly more complaints than other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1432
States & territories reporting
52
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (512)
Most reported state/territory
California (184)

Where the complaints came from

On 17 September 2015, the 1432 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 905 cities across 52 states and territories. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 184 12.8%
Florida 116 8.1%
Texas 98 6.8%
Maryland 79 5.5%
New York 72 5.0%
Georgia 71 5.0%
Pennsylvania 61 4.3%
Illinois 47 3.3%
New Jersey 45 3.1%
Ohio 45 3.1%
Other states and territories 605 42.2%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 1013 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 1013 70.7%
Internet 213 14.9%
TV 132 9.2%
Radio 68 4.7%
Request for Dispute Assistance 3 0.2%
Emergency 2 0.1%
Accessibility 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

1013 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 70.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 512 50.5%
Robocalls 190 18.8%
Billing 148 14.6%
Availability (including rural call completion) 46 4.5%
Equipment 33 3.3%
Junk Faxes 27 2.7%
Privacy 27 2.7%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 11 1.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 7 0.7%
Interference (including signal jammers) 5 0.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 5 0.5%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.2%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

213 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 58 27.2%
Availability 45 21.1%
Speed 31 14.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 29 13.6%
Privacy 22 10.3%
Equipment 16 7.5%
Interference 11 5.2%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

132 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 9.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 53 40.2%
Availability 23 17.4%
Equipment 17 12.9%
Indecency 17 12.9%
Loud Commercials 14 10.6%
Interference 6 4.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.8%
Privacy 1 0.8%

Billing represented the largest share of complaints recorded in this category, with lower volumes reported across the remaining issues.

Radio complaints

68 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 4.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 52 76.5%
Indecency 8 11.8%
Commercials/Promotions 3 4.4%
Availability 2 2.9%
Pirate Radio 2 2.9%
Equipment 1 1.5%

Interference and Indecency were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 17 September 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.