FCC Consumer Complaints – September 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 29764 consumer complaints in September 2015 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume fell from 30365 complaints the previous month. Reports were received from 55 states and territories, with California recording slightly more complaints than other locations. The most common issue reported was Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), accounting for 10380 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
29764
Days with complaint data
30
Days with complaints
30
States & territories reporting
55
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (10380)
Most reported state/territory
California (3385)

Daily complaint activity

Across the month, the FCC recorded an average of 992.1 complaints per day. The highest daily total was 1514 complaints on 2 September 2015, while 21 days recorded more complaints than the monthly daily average. The lowest daily total was 323 complaints on 27 September 2015, well below the monthly average.

Each bar represents one day of the month. Taller bars indicate more complaints.

Where the complaints came from

A total of 29764 complaints were recorded in September 2015, with reports originating from 5849 cities in 55 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 129 of the 143 complaints recorded in the state.

The monthly distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints Share
California 3385 11.4%
Florida 2797 9.4%
Texas 1954 6.6%
New York 1554 5.2%
Maryland 1441 4.8%
Georgia 1372 4.6%
Pennsylvania 1303 4.4%
Illinois 1100 3.7%
Virginia 1006 3.4%
New Jersey 907 3.0%
Other states and territories 12905 43.4%

Location highlight

Nearly all complaints reported in District of Columbia originated from Washington.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded during the month were spread across 7 complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 20165 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 20165 67.7%
Internet 5436 18.3%
TV 2931 9.8%
Radio 1039 3.5%
Emergency 111 0.4%
Accessibility 74 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 8 0.0%

Phone complaints

20165 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 67.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 10380 51.5%
Robocalls 4641 23.0%
Billing 1639 8.1%
Availability (including rural call completion) 715 3.5%
Equipment 644 3.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 603 3.0%
Privacy 521 2.6%
Junk Faxes 433 2.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 308 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 151 0.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 97 0.5%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 33 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

5436 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 18.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 1711 31.5%
Availability 1007 18.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 765 14.1%
Speed 755 13.9%
Privacy 534 9.8%
Interference 384 7.1%
Equipment 278 5.1%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Availability and Open Internet/Net Neutrality among the most common.

TV complaints

2931 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 9.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 1184 40.4%
Availability 500 17.1%
Equipment 358 12.2%
Loud Commercials 355 12.1%
Indecency 301 10.3%
Interference 161 5.5%
Privacy 52 1.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 20 0.7%

Billing represented the largest share of complaints recorded in this category, with lower volumes reported across the remaining issues.

Radio complaints

1039 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 3.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 837 80.6%
Indecency 73 7.0%
Pirate Radio 50 4.8%
Availability 30 2.9%
Commercials/Promotions 24 2.3%
Equipment 19 1.8%
Billing 5 0.5%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Emergency complaints

111 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Other 62 55.9%
Interference 25 22.5%
Phone 17 15.3%
Tower 6 5.4%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Other and Interference, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Accessibility complaints

74 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Closed Captioning on TV 40 54.1%
Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) 15 20.3%
Closed Captioning over the Internet 12 16.2%
Video Description 3 4.1%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireline Phones 2 2.7%
Emergency Information on TV 1 1.4%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Closed Captioning on TV and Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS), with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from September 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.