FCC Consumer Complaints – 26 September 2015

Introduction

A total of 557 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on Saturday, 26 September 2015, this was lower than the 1118 complaints recorded the day before. Reports were received from 47 states and territories, with California recording slightly more complaints than other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
557
States & territories reporting
47
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (168)
Most reported state/territory
California (82)

Where the complaints came from

The 557 complaints recorded on 26 September 2015 were submitted from 409 cities across 47 states and territories. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 82 14.7%
Florida 45 8.1%
Georgia 30 5.4%
Illinois 30 5.4%
Maryland 30 5.4%
New York 30 5.4%
Texas 27 4.8%
Virginia 27 4.8%
Washington 23 4.1%
Ohio 18 3.2%
Other states and territories 215 38.6%

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 6 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 329 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 329 59.1%
Internet 117 21.0%
TV 72 12.9%
Radio 32 5.7%
Accessibility 4 0.7%
Emergency 3 0.5%

Phone complaints

329 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 59.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 168 51.1%
Robocalls 83 25.2%
Billing 28 8.5%
Equipment 14 4.3%
Privacy 11 3.3%
Availability (including rural call completion) 7 2.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 5 1.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 5 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 1.2%
Junk Faxes 3 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.3%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

117 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 21.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Speed 30 25.6%
Billing 24 20.5%
Privacy 18 15.4%
Availability 15 12.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 13 11.1%
Interference 12 10.3%
Equipment 5 4.3%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Speed, Billing and Privacy.

TV complaints

72 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 12.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 34 47.2%
Availability 9 12.5%
Equipment 9 12.5%
Loud Commercials 9 12.5%
Interference 5 6.9%
Indecency 4 5.6%
Privacy 2 2.8%

Billing represented the largest share of complaints recorded in this category, with lower volumes reported across the remaining issues.

Radio complaints

32 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 5.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 22 68.8%
Indecency 6 18.8%
Pirate Radio 2 6.3%
Availability 1 3.1%
Commercials/Promotions 1 3.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 26 September 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.