FCC Consumer Complaints – 25 September 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 1118 consumer complaints on 25 September 2015 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume fell from 1194 complaints the previous day. The complaints came from 48 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints were most commonly associated with Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), accounting for 424 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1118
States & territories reporting
48
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (424)
Most reported state/territory
California (142)

Where the complaints came from

The 1118 complaints recorded on 25 September 2015 originated from 738 cities across 48 states and territories. Complaint reports were spread across multiple states and territories, without any one location accounting for a large share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 142 12.7%
Texas 92 8.2%
Florida 84 7.5%
New York 59 5.3%
Illinois 54 4.8%
Pennsylvania 49 4.4%
Georgia 44 3.9%
Maryland 41 3.7%
Michigan 40 3.6%
New Jersey 38 3.4%
Other states and territories 475 42.5%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 819 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 819 73.3%
Internet 129 11.5%
TV 125 11.2%
Radio 35 3.1%
Emergency 5 0.4%
Accessibility 4 0.4%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

819 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 73.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 424 51.8%
Robocalls 207 25.3%
Billing 59 7.2%
Equipment 31 3.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 26 3.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 19 2.3%
Privacy 19 2.3%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 14 1.7%
Junk Faxes 12 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 5 0.6%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.2%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.1%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

129 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 35 27.1%
Availability 29 22.5%
Privacy 20 15.5%
Interference 14 10.9%
Speed 11 8.5%
Equipment 10 7.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 10 7.8%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Availability and Privacy.

TV complaints

125 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 43 34.4%
Indecency 20 16.0%
Availability 19 15.2%
Equipment 17 13.6%
Loud Commercials 17 13.6%
Interference 3 2.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 2.4%
Privacy 3 2.4%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Indecency and Availability.

Radio complaints

35 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 3.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 24 68.6%
Pirate Radio 5 14.3%
Commercials/Promotions 2 5.7%
Indecency 2 5.7%
Availability 1 2.9%
Equipment 1 2.9%

Interference and Pirate Radio were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 25 September 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.