FCC Consumer Complaints – 5 October 2015

Introduction

On 5 October 2015, 1082 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this was higher than the 659 complaints recorded the day before. Reports were received from 51 states and territories, with Florida recording slightly more complaints than other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) was the most frequently reported issue, with 365 complaints recorded.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1082
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (365)
Most reported state/territory
Florida (120)

Where the complaints came from

Across 744 cities in 51 states and territories, a total of 1082 complaints were recorded on 5 October 2015. Complaints were distributed across states and territories in a broadly even manner, with no individual location standing out significantly. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
Florida 120 11.1%
California 115 10.6%
Texas 63 5.8%
New York 59 5.5%
Maryland 57 5.3%
Georgia 52 4.8%
Pennsylvania 51 4.7%
Virginia 40 3.7%
Massachusetts 33 3.0%
Illinois 30 2.8%
Other states and territories 462 42.7%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 7 complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 746 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 746 68.9%
Internet 172 15.9%
TV 110 10.2%
Radio 42 3.9%
Accessibility 5 0.5%
Emergency 5 0.5%
Request for Dispute Assistance 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

746 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 68.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 365 48.9%
Robocalls 153 20.5%
Billing 61 8.2%
Availability (including rural call completion) 40 5.4%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 33 4.4%
Junk Faxes 27 3.6%
Privacy 22 2.9%
Equipment 19 2.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 13 1.7%
Interference (including signal jammers) 9 1.2%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 0.4%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.1%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

172 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 54 31.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 31 18.0%
Availability 30 17.4%
Speed 20 11.6%
Privacy 19 11.0%
Equipment 9 5.2%
Interference 9 5.2%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Open Internet/Net Neutrality and Availability.

TV complaints

110 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 10.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 49 44.5%
Availability 19 17.3%
Loud Commercials 15 13.6%
Indecency 11 10.0%
Equipment 8 7.3%
Interference 7 6.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.9%

Billing and Availability accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Radio complaints

42 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 3.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 36 85.7%
Indecency 4 9.5%
Equipment 1 2.4%
Pirate Radio 1 2.4%

Interference and Indecency accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 5 October 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.