FCC Consumer Complaints – 10 October 2015

Introduction

A total of 590 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on 10 October 2015, complaint volume fell from 1177 complaints the day before. Complaints were reported across 50 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. The most common issue reported was Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), accounting for 201 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
590
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (201)
Most reported state/territory
California (73)

Where the complaints came from

Across 429 cities in 50 states and territories, a total of 590 complaints were recorded on 10 October 2015. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Maryland, where Frederick accounted for 36 of the 49 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 73 12.4%
Florida 57 9.7%
Maryland 49 8.3%
Texas 44 7.5%
Illinois 24 4.1%
New York 24 4.1%
North Carolina 23 3.9%
Pennsylvania 22 3.7%
Georgia 19 3.2%
Virginia 19 3.2%
Other states and territories 236 40.0%

Location highlights

  • A large share of complaints in Maryland originated from Frederick, which accounted for most reports within the state.
  • Complaints in California were reported across 52 cities, the widest spread observed on this date.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 355 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 355 60.2%
TV 103 17.5%
Internet 86 14.6%
Radio 43 7.3%
Emergency 2 0.3%
Accessibility 1 0.2%

Phone complaints

355 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 60.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 201 56.6%
Robocalls 63 17.7%
Billing 34 9.6%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 16 4.5%
Availability (including rural call completion) 11 3.1%
Equipment 8 2.3%
Privacy 8 2.3%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 6 1.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 0.8%
Interference (including signal jammers) 2 0.6%
Junk Faxes 2 0.6%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.3%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

TV complaints

103 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 17.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 54 52.4%
Billing 18 17.5%
Equipment 11 10.7%
Indecency 11 10.7%
Loud Commercials 8 7.8%
Interference 1 1.0%

Availability and Billing were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

86 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 20 23.3%
Availability 18 20.9%
Speed 18 20.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 16 18.6%
Equipment 6 7.0%
Privacy 5 5.8%
Interference 3 3.5%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

Radio complaints

43 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 7.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 37 86.0%
Commercials/Promotions 2 4.7%
Indecency 2 4.7%
Pirate Radio 2 4.7%

Interference and Commercials/Promotions were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 10 October 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.