FCC Consumer Complaints – 11 October 2015

Introduction

On Sunday, 11 October 2015, 377 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this was lower than the 590 complaints recorded the previous day. Reports were received from 39 states and territories, with complaints distributed across multiple locations with similar counts. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
377
States & territories reporting
39
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (68)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 11 October 2015 show 377 complaints originating from 275 cities across 39 states and territories. Complaints were spread broadly across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a significant share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Maryland, where Frederick accounted for 25 of the 37 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 37 9.8%
Maryland 37 9.8%
Texas 35 9.3%
Florida 34 9.0%
Colorado 23 6.1%
Washington 17 4.5%
Indiana 16 4.2%
New York 14 3.7%
Georgia 11 2.9%
Michigan 11 2.9%
Other states and territories 142 37.7%

Location highlight

Frederick accounted for the majority of complaints recorded in Maryland.

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. Phone was the most reported category, with 151 complaints. This was followed by TV, which accounted for 113 complaints.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 151 40.1%
TV 113 30.0%
Internet 75 19.9%
Radio 35 9.3%
Emergency 2 0.5%
Accessibility 1 0.3%

Phone complaints

151 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 40.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 68 45.0%
Robocalls 27 17.9%
Billing 18 11.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 14 9.3%
Equipment 7 4.6%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 5 3.3%
Privacy 4 2.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 2.0%
Junk Faxes 2 1.3%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 2 1.3%
Interference (including signal jammers) 1 0.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

TV complaints

113 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 30.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 47 41.6%
Equipment 18 15.9%
Loud Commercials 17 15.0%
Indecency 15 13.3%
Billing 13 11.5%
Interference 3 2.7%

Availability accounted for the largest share of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

75 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 19.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 18 24.0%
Privacy 15 20.0%
Availability 13 17.3%
Speed 13 17.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 11 14.7%
Equipment 3 4.0%
Interference 2 2.7%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Privacy and Availability.

Radio complaints

35 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 9.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 28 80.0%
Indecency 2 5.7%
Availability 1 2.9%
Billing 1 2.9%
Commercials/Promotions 1 2.9%
Equipment 1 2.9%
Pirate Radio 1 2.9%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 11 October 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.