FCC Consumer Complaints – 11 January 2016

Introduction

On 11 January 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 901 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, this was higher than the 327 complaints recorded the previous day. The complaints came from 48 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
901
States & territories reporting
48
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (295)
Most reported state/territory
California (88)

Where the complaints came from

The 901 complaints recorded on 11 January 2016 were submitted from 649 cities across 48 states and territories. Complaints were spread broadly across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a significant share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 88 9.8%
Florida 82 9.1%
Texas 62 6.9%
New York 55 6.1%
Georgia 34 3.8%
Pennsylvania 33 3.7%
Maryland 30 3.3%
North Carolina 30 3.3%
Ohio 29 3.2%
Michigan 28 3.1%
Other states and territories 428 47.5%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 647 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 647 71.8%
Internet 149 16.5%
TV 90 10.0%
Radio 10 1.1%
Accessibility 3 0.3%
Emergency 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

647 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 71.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 295 45.6%
Robocalls 133 20.6%
Billing 83 12.8%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 38 5.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 27 4.2%
Equipment 20 3.1%
Privacy 18 2.8%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 14 2.2%
Junk Faxes 13 2.0%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 0.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.2%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

149 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 16.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 58 38.9%
Availability 23 15.4%
Speed 21 14.1%
Privacy 19 12.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 14 9.4%
Equipment 10 6.7%
Interference 4 2.7%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

90 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 10.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 45 50.0%
Availability 13 14.4%
Indecency 9 10.0%
Loud Commercials 9 10.0%
Interference 7 7.8%
Equipment 6 6.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 1.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 11 January 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.