FCC Consumer Complaints – 2 February 2016

Introduction

On Tuesday, 2 February 2016, 1162 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented an increase from the 976 complaints recorded the previous day. Reports were received from 51 states and territories, with California recording slightly more complaints than other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1162
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (397)
Most reported state/territory
California (132)

Where the complaints came from

The 1162 complaints recorded on 2 February 2016 were submitted from 809 cities across 51 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 132 11.4%
Texas 89 7.7%
Florida 83 7.1%
New York 76 6.5%
Pennsylvania 61 5.2%
New Jersey 52 4.5%
Washington 41 3.5%
Georgia 36 3.1%
Illinois 36 3.1%
Tennessee 35 3.0%
Other states and territories 515 44.3%

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 6 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 859 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 859 73.9%
Internet 169 14.5%
TV 116 10.0%
Radio 16 1.4%
Emergency 1 0.1%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

859 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 73.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 397 46.2%
Robocalls 199 23.2%
Billing 127 14.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 32 3.7%
Equipment 30 3.5%
Junk Faxes 23 2.7%
Privacy 19 2.2%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 13 1.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 10 1.2%
Interference (including signal jammers) 7 0.8%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.2%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

169 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 49 29.0%
Privacy 30 17.8%
Availability 27 16.0%
Speed 26 15.4%
Interference 18 10.7%
Equipment 10 5.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 9 5.3%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Privacy and Availability among the most common.

TV complaints

116 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 10.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 50 43.1%
Availability 31 26.7%
Equipment 16 13.8%
Loud Commercials 8 6.9%
Indecency 7 6.0%
Privacy 2 1.7%
Interference 1 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.9%

Billing and Availability accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 2 February 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.