FCC Consumer Complaints – February 2016

Introduction

In February 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 28105 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 25639 complaints the month before. Complaints were reported across 55 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
28105
Days with complaint data
29
Days with complaints
29
States & territories reporting
55
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (9464)
Most reported state/territory
California (3238)

Daily complaint activity

The month averaged 969.1 complaints per day. The highest daily count was 1652 complaints on 12 February 2016, with 20 days recording more complaints than the monthly daily average. The quietest day was 14 February 2016, with 285 complaints, noticeably below the monthly average.

Each bar represents one day of the month. Taller bars indicate more complaints.

Where the complaints came from

Across 5911 cities in 55 states and territories, a total of 28105 complaints were recorded in February 2016. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 128 of the 140 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this month, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints Share
California 3238 11.5%
Florida 2269 8.1%
Texas 1865 6.6%
New York 1707 6.1%
Georgia 1310 4.7%
Pennsylvania 1225 4.4%
Illinois 1030 3.7%
Virginia 1012 3.6%
New Jersey 842 3.0%
Ohio 839 3.0%
Other states and territories 12736 45.3%

Location highlight

Complaint activity in District of Columbia was almost entirely concentrated in Washington.

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded during the month related to 7 different complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 19626 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 19626 69.8%
Internet 5077 18.1%
TV 2879 10.2%
Radio 401 1.4%
Accessibility 64 0.2%
Emergency 49 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 9 0.0%

Phone complaints

19626 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 69.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 9464 48.2%
Robocalls 5074 25.9%
Billing 1915 9.8%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 599 3.1%
Privacy 578 2.9%
Equipment 550 2.8%
Junk Faxes 483 2.5%
Availability (including rural call completion) 482 2.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 242 1.2%
Interference (including signal jammers) 135 0.7%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 52 0.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 48 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

5077 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 18.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1445 28.5%
Billing 1285 25.3%
Availability 756 14.9%
Speed 628 12.4%
Privacy 474 9.3%
Interference 271 5.3%
Equipment 218 4.3%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Open Internet/Net Neutrality, Billing and Availability.

TV complaints

2879 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 10.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 1195 41.5%
Availability 635 22.1%
Equipment 312 10.8%
Loud Commercials 270 9.4%
Indecency 257 8.9%
Interference 135 4.7%
Privacy 56 1.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 19 0.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Radio complaints

401 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 1.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 188 46.9%
Indecency 87 21.7%
Pirate Radio 37 9.2%
Commercials/Promotions 35 8.7%
Equipment 23 5.7%
Billing 16 4.0%
Availability 15 3.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Accessibility complaints

64 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) 24 37.5%
Closed Captioning on TV 21 32.8%
Closed Captioning over the Internet 13 20.3%
Video Description 3 4.7%
Emergency Information on TV 1 1.6%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireline Phones 1 1.6%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) and Closed Captioning on TV, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Emergency complaints

49 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Other 18 36.7%
Interference 13 26.5%
Phone 12 24.5%
Tower 6 12.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Other and Interference, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from February 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.