FCC Consumer Complaints – 17 February 2016

Introduction

On 17 February 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 1330 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 1256 complaints the day before. The complaints came from 51 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1330
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (457)
Most reported state/territory
California (177)

Where the complaints came from

A total of 1330 complaints were recorded on 17 February 2016, with reports originating from 866 cities in 51 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. At the city level, complaints were similarly dispersed, with no single location accounting for a notable share of the total.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 177 13.3%
Florida 110 8.3%
Georgia 93 7.0%
New York 79 5.9%
Texas 63 4.7%
Pennsylvania 57 4.3%
Illinois 44 3.3%
North Carolina 42 3.2%
New Jersey 42 3.2%
Washington 37 2.8%
Other states and territories 583 43.8%

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 975 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 975 73.3%
TV 182 13.7%
Internet 150 11.3%
Radio 17 1.3%
Emergency 4 0.3%
Accessibility 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

975 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 73.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 457 46.9%
Robocalls 241 24.7%
Billing 105 10.8%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 36 3.7%
Availability (including rural call completion) 34 3.5%
Junk Faxes 28 2.9%
Privacy 26 2.7%
Equipment 24 2.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 15 1.5%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 4 0.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 3 0.3%
Interference (including signal jammers) 2 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

TV complaints

182 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 13.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 67 36.8%
Availability 65 35.7%
Equipment 16 8.8%
Indecency 14 7.7%
Interference 13 7.1%
Privacy 4 2.2%
Loud Commercials 3 1.6%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

150 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 50 33.3%
Availability 36 24.0%
Speed 23 15.3%
Privacy 16 10.7%
Equipment 10 6.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 9 6.0%
Interference 6 4.0%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Availability and Speed among the most common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 17 February 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.