FCC Consumer Complaints – 8 February 2016

Introduction

On 8 February 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 979 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 297 complaints the day before. Complaints were reported across 52 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
979
States & territories reporting
52
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (300)
Most reported state/territory
California (118)

Where the complaints came from

The 979 complaints recorded on 8 February 2016 were submitted from 673 cities across 52 states and territories. Complaint activity was fairly evenly distributed, with no single state or territory accounting for a large share of reports. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 118 12.1%
Florida 81 8.3%
Texas 64 6.5%
New York 55 5.6%
Virginia 48 4.9%
Pennsylvania 43 4.4%
Georgia 41 4.2%
Michigan 39 4.0%
Washington 39 4.0%
Missouri 31 3.2%
Other states and territories 418 42.7%

What the complaints were about

A total of 7 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 691 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 691 70.6%
Internet 138 14.1%
TV 118 12.1%
Radio 21 2.1%
Accessibility 8 0.8%
Emergency 2 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

691 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 70.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 300 43.4%
Robocalls 180 26.0%
Billing 75 10.9%
Junk Faxes 38 5.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 34 4.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 19 2.7%
Equipment 17 2.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 11 1.6%
Privacy 10 1.4%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 0.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 0.3%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

138 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 40 29.0%
Availability 36 26.1%
Privacy 22 15.9%
Speed 17 12.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 11 8.0%
Interference 7 5.1%
Equipment 5 3.6%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Privacy.

TV complaints

118 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 12.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 43 36.4%
Indecency 32 27.1%
Availability 17 14.4%
Equipment 12 10.2%
Loud Commercials 7 5.9%
Interference 5 4.2%
Privacy 2 1.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 8 February 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.