FCC Consumer Complaints – 4 July 2016

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 384 consumer complaints on Monday, 4 July 2016 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 245 complaints the day before. Complaints were reported across 44 states and territories, with Maryland slightly ahead of the other locations. Complaints relating to Interference were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
384
States & territories reporting
44
Most common issue
Interference (65)
Most reported state/territory
Maryland (56)

Where the complaints came from

The 384 complaints recorded on 4 July 2016 originated from 245 cities across 44 states and territories. Complaint activity was fairly evenly distributed, with no single state or territory accounting for a large share of reports. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in Maryland, where Frederick accounted for 51 of the 56 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
Maryland 56 14.6%
California 44 11.5%
Connecticut 28 7.3%
Florida 28 7.3%
Texas 26 6.8%
New Jersey 15 3.9%
Virginia 13 3.4%
New York 12 3.1%
Washington 12 3.1%
Kentucky 10 2.6%
Other states and territories 140 36.5%

Location highlight

Nearly all complaints reported in Maryland originated from Frederick.

What the complaints were about

A total of 6 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 182 complaints. This was followed by Internet, which accounted for 87 complaints.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 182 47.4%
Internet 87 22.7%
Radio 56 14.6%
TV 56 14.6%
Emergency 2 0.5%
Accessibility 1 0.3%

Phone complaints

182 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 47.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 62 34.1%
Robocalls 47 25.8%
Billing 27 14.8%
Equipment 14 7.7%
Privacy 11 6.0%
Availability (including rural call completion) 7 3.8%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 2.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 4 2.2%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 3 1.6%
Junk Faxes 2 1.1%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.5%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), Robocalls and Billing.

Internet complaints

87 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 22.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 18 20.7%
Speed 17 19.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 16 18.4%
Billing 14 16.1%
Privacy 12 13.8%
Interference 6 6.9%
Equipment 4 4.6%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Availability, Speed and Open Internet/Net Neutrality.

Radio complaints

56 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 54 96.4%
Availability 1 1.8%
Indecency 1 1.8%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

TV complaints

56 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 23 41.1%
Equipment 8 14.3%
Loud Commercials 8 14.3%
Availability 7 12.5%
Interference 5 8.9%
Indecency 4 7.1%
Privacy 1 1.8%

Billing represented the largest share of complaints recorded in this category, with lower volumes reported across the remaining issues.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 4 July 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.