FCC Consumer Complaints – 27 July 2016

Introduction

On 27 July 2016, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 1116 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, this was lower than the 1219 complaints recorded the day before. The complaints came from 51 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1116
States & territories reporting
51
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (393)
Most reported state/territory
California (131)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 27 July 2016 show 1116 complaints originating from 738 cities across 51 states and territories. Complaint activity was fairly evenly distributed, with no single state or territory accounting for a large share of reports. At the city level, complaints were similarly dispersed, with no single location accounting for a notable share of the total.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 131 11.7%
Texas 103 9.2%
Florida 98 8.8%
New York 61 5.5%
Georgia 52 4.7%
Maryland 48 4.3%
Illinois 45 4.0%
Ohio 43 3.9%
Pennsylvania 40 3.6%
Virginia 36 3.2%
Other states and territories 459 41.1%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 810 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 810 72.6%
Internet 179 16.0%
TV 102 9.1%
Radio 20 1.8%
Accessibility 3 0.3%
Emergency 1 0.1%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

810 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 72.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 393 48.5%
Robocalls 214 26.4%
Billing 82 10.1%
Availability (including rural call completion) 26 3.2%
Equipment 26 3.2%
Privacy 18 2.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 14 1.7%
Interference (including signal jammers) 13 1.6%
Junk Faxes 8 1.0%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 7 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 7 0.9%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

179 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 16.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 57 31.8%
Availability 47 26.3%
Speed 25 14.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 19 10.6%
Interference 13 7.3%
Privacy 10 5.6%
Equipment 8 4.5%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Speed.

TV complaints

102 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 9.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 56 54.9%
Availability 17 16.7%
Indecency 12 11.8%
Equipment 8 7.8%
Loud Commercials 5 4.9%
Interference 2 2.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 2.0%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 27 July 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.