FCC Consumer Complaints – 26 August 2016

Introduction

On 26 August 2016, 1289 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this was lower than the 1299 complaints recorded the previous day. Complaints were reported across 50 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1289
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (375)
Most reported state/territory
California (148)

Where the complaints came from

The 1289 complaints recorded on 26 August 2016 originated from 772 cities across 50 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 58 of the 71 complaints recorded in the state.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 148 11.5%
Florida 117 9.1%
Texas 84 6.5%
District of Columbia 71 5.5%
New York 68 5.3%
Virginia 66 5.1%
Pennsylvania 63 4.9%
Michigan 40 3.1%
Illinois 38 2.9%
North Carolina 38 2.9%
Other states and territories 556 43.1%

Location highlights

  • Only two cities were associated with complaints in District of Columbia, Washington and Washington Dc.
  • A large share of complaints in District of Columbia originated from Washington, which accounted for most reports within the state.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 7 complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 983 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 983 76.3%
Internet 156 12.1%
TV 115 8.9%
Radio 22 1.7%
Accessibility 5 0.4%
Emergency 4 0.3%
Request for Dispute Assistance 4 0.3%

Phone complaints

983 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 76.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 375 38.1%
Robocalls 258 26.2%
Availability (including rural call completion) 164 16.7%
Billing 84 8.5%
Equipment 26 2.6%
Privacy 22 2.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 16 1.6%
Interference (including signal jammers) 10 1.0%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 9 0.9%
Junk Faxes 9 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 6 0.6%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 3 0.3%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

156 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 12.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 44 28.2%
Billing 34 21.8%
Speed 33 21.2%
Privacy 14 9.0%
Equipment 12 7.7%
Interference 10 6.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 9 5.8%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Availability, Billing and Speed among the most common.

TV complaints

115 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 8.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 47 40.9%
Availability 25 21.7%
Equipment 15 13.0%
Loud Commercials 11 9.6%
Indecency 10 8.7%
Interference 5 4.3%
Privacy 2 1.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 26 August 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.