FCC Consumer Complaints – 27 August 2016

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 561 consumer complaints on Saturday, 27 August 2016 relating to telecommunications services, this represented a decline from the 1289 complaints recorded the previous day. The complaints came from 46 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
561
States & territories reporting
46
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (139)
Most reported state/territory
California (89)

Where the complaints came from

A total of 561 complaints were recorded on 27 August 2016, with reports originating from 407 cities in 46 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. A notable concentration at the city level was observed in Maryland, where Frederick accounted for 26 of the 38 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 89 15.9%
Florida 48 8.6%
Texas 40 7.1%
Maryland 38 6.8%
Pennsylvania 30 5.3%
Illinois 23 4.1%
New York 22 3.9%
Georgia 20 3.6%
Washington 18 3.2%
Virginia 16 2.9%
Other states and territories 217 38.7%

Location highlight

Complaints in Maryland were heavily concentrated in Frederick, which accounted for the majority of reports within the state.

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 5 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 334 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 334 59.5%
Internet 108 19.3%
TV 78 13.9%
Radio 38 6.8%
Emergency 3 0.5%

Phone complaints

334 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 59.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 139 41.6%
Robocalls 91 27.2%
Billing 38 11.4%
Privacy 25 7.5%
Equipment 16 4.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 7 2.1%
Interference (including signal jammers) 7 2.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 5 1.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 3 0.9%
Junk Faxes 2 0.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.3%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

108 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 19.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 41 38.0%
Speed 20 18.5%
Availability 17 15.7%
Privacy 12 11.1%
Equipment 9 8.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 6 5.6%
Interference 3 2.8%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Speed and Availability.

TV complaints

78 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 13.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 27 34.6%
Availability 16 20.5%
Loud Commercials 13 16.7%
Equipment 8 10.3%
Indecency 5 6.4%
Privacy 5 6.4%
Interference 3 3.8%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 1.3%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Loud Commercials.

Radio complaints

38 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 6.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 34 89.5%
Availability 2 5.3%
Billing 1 2.6%
Indecency 1 2.6%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 27 August 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.