FCC Consumer Complaints – 7 November 2016

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 965 consumer complaints on Monday, 7 November 2016 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume increased from 419 complaints the day before. The complaints came from 49 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Unwanted Calls recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
965
States & territories reporting
49
Most common issue
Unwanted Calls (414)
Most reported state/territory
California (128)

Where the complaints came from

The 965 complaints recorded on 7 November 2016 originated from 651 cities across 49 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 128 13.3%
Florida 71 7.4%
Pennsylvania 62 6.4%
Texas 59 6.1%
Illinois 47 4.9%
New York 44 4.6%
Maryland 42 4.4%
Colorado 41 4.2%
Georgia 39 4.0%
Ohio 36 3.7%
Other states and territories 387 40.1%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 651 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 651 67.5%
Internet 162 16.8%
TV 115 11.9%
Radio 31 3.2%
Accessibility 2 0.2%
Emergency 2 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 2 0.2%

Phone complaints

651 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 67.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 414 63.6%
Billing 115 17.7%
Availability (including rural call completion) 29 4.5%
Equipment 22 3.4%
Junk Faxes 18 2.8%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 14 2.2%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 13 2.0%
Privacy 13 2.0%
Interference (including signal jammers) 6 0.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 5 0.8%
Rural Call Completion 1 0.2%

As is typical for this category, unwanted calls accounted for the largest share of complaints. A more detailed analysis of these reports is provided in the section below. A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Availability (including rural call completion) and Equipment among the most common.

Internet complaints

162 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 16.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 53 32.7%
Availability 31 19.1%
Speed 29 17.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 18 11.1%
Equipment 12 7.4%
Interference 10 6.2%
Privacy 8 4.9%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Availability and Speed among the most common.

TV complaints

115 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 11.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 44 38.3%
Availability 21 18.3%
Indecency 15 13.0%
Loud Commercials 13 11.3%
Equipment 12 10.4%
Interference 7 6.1%
Privacy 2 1.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 1 0.9%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Availability and Indecency among the most common.

Radio complaints

31 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 3.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 16 51.6%
Indecency 7 22.6%
Pirate Radio 5 16.1%
Availability 2 6.5%
Commercials/Promotions 1 3.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 7 November 2016.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.