FCC Consumer Complaints – 10 May 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 236 consumer complaints on Sunday, 10 May 2015 relating to telecommunications services, this represented a decline from the 388 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 41 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
236
States & territories reporting
41
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (52)
Most reported state/territory
California (41)

Where the complaints came from

On 10 May 2015, the 236 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 179 cities across 41 states and territories. Overall, complaint activity was broadly distributed, with no single state or territory representing a significant proportion of the total. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 41 17.4%
Maryland 26 11.0%
Florida 20 8.5%
New York 15 6.4%
Texas 13 5.5%
Illinois 11 4.7%
South Carolina 9 3.8%
New Jersey 8 3.4%
Arizona 6 2.5%
North Carolina 6 2.5%
Other states and territories 80 33.9%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 5 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 137 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 137 58.1%
TV 42 17.8%
Internet 32 13.6%
Radio 24 10.2%
Emergency 1 0.4%

Phone complaints

137 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 58.1% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 52 38.0%
Billing 22 16.1%
Robocalls 22 16.1%
Equipment 13 9.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 8 5.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 6 4.4%
Privacy 5 3.6%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 2.9%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 4 2.9%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), Billing and Robocalls among the most common.

TV complaints

42 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 17.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 13 31.0%
Indecency 9 21.4%
Availability 7 16.7%
Loud Commercials 6 14.3%
Equipment 4 9.5%
Interference 3 7.1%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Indecency and Availability among the most common.

Internet complaints

32 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 13.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 11 34.4%
Billing 9 28.1%
Privacy 5 15.6%
Interference 3 9.4%
Speed 3 9.4%
Equipment 1 3.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Availability and Billing, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Radio complaints

24 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 10.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 22 91.7%
Equipment 1 4.2%
Indecency 1 4.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Equipment, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 10 May 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.