FCC Consumer Complaints – 15 November 2015

Introduction

A total of 320 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded by the Federal Communications Commission on 15 November 2015, this was lower than the 490 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 44 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Billing was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
320
States & territories reporting
44
Most common issue
Billing (58)
Most reported state/territory
California (37)

Where the complaints came from

The 320 complaints recorded on 15 November 2015 originated from 237 cities across 44 states and territories. The distribution of complaints was relatively even, with no single state or territory contributing a dominant share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 37 11.6%
Washington 28 8.8%
Maryland 23 7.2%
Florida 22 6.9%
Pennsylvania 19 5.9%
New York 15 4.7%
Georgia 13 4.1%
North Carolina 13 4.1%
Arizona 10 3.1%
Massachusetts 9 2.8%
Other states and territories 131 40.9%

Location highlight

California had the widest distribution of complaints, with reports originating from 33 different cities.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 6 complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 132 complaints. This was followed by Internet, which accounted for 89 complaints.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 132 41.3%
Internet 89 27.8%
TV 50 15.6%
Radio 46 14.4%
Emergency 2 0.6%
Accessibility 1 0.3%

Phone complaints

132 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 41.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 53 40.2%
Robocalls 23 17.4%
Billing 21 15.9%
Equipment 9 6.8%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 8 6.1%
Privacy 5 3.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 4 3.0%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 4 3.0%
Junk Faxes 2 1.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 1 0.8%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) represented the largest share of complaints recorded in this category, with lower volumes reported across the remaining issues.

Internet complaints

89 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 27.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 21 23.6%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 15 16.9%
Availability 12 13.5%
Privacy 12 13.5%
Speed 12 13.5%
Equipment 9 10.1%
Interference 8 9.0%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Open Internet/Net Neutrality and Availability.

TV complaints

50 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 15 30.0%
Availability 9 18.0%
Indecency 9 18.0%
Equipment 6 12.0%
Interference 6 12.0%
Loud Commercials 4 8.0%
Privacy 1 2.0%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability and Indecency.

Radio complaints

46 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 21 45.7%
Interference 17 37.0%
Indecency 4 8.7%
Billing 1 2.2%
Commercials/Promotions 1 2.2%
Equipment 1 2.2%
Pirate Radio 1 2.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Availability and Interference, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 15 November 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.