FCC Consumer Complaints – November 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 29357 consumer complaints in November 2015 relating to telecommunications services, complaint volume fell from 31942 complaints the month before. Complaints were reported across 56 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) recorded a slightly higher number of complaints than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
29357
Days with complaint data
30
Days with complaints
30
States & territories reporting
56
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (9163)
Most reported state/territory
California (3327)

Daily complaint activity

The month averaged 978.6 complaints per day. The highest daily count was 2071 complaints on 4 November 2015, with 16 days recording more complaints than the monthly daily average. The quietest day was 15 November 2015, with 320 complaints, noticeably below the monthly average.

Each bar represents one day of the month. Taller bars indicate more complaints.

Where the complaints came from

In November 2015, the 29357 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 5797 cities across 56 states and territories. Activity was spread across states and territories, with no single location accounting for a substantial share of complaints. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 112 of the 128 complaints recorded in the state.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this month, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints Share
California 3327 11.3%
Florida 2642 9.0%
Texas 1750 6.0%
New York 1489 5.1%
Georgia 1414 4.8%
Pennsylvania 1318 4.5%
Maryland 1187 4.0%
Illinois 1108 3.8%
Tennessee 1032 3.5%
Washington 967 3.3%
Other states and territories 13074 44.5%

Location highlights

  • Washington accounted for the majority of complaints recorded in District of Columbia.
  • Complaints in California were reported across 575 cities, the widest spread observed during the month.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded during the month were spread across 7 complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 18193 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 18193 62.0%
Internet 7748 26.4%
TV 2465 8.4%
Radio 809 2.8%
Emergency 86 0.3%
Accessibility 48 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 8 0.0%

Phone complaints

18193 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 62.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 9163 50.4%
Robocalls 4322 23.8%
Billing 1715 9.4%
Availability (including rural call completion) 595 3.3%
Equipment 536 2.9%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 508 2.8%
Privacy 467 2.6%
Junk Faxes 347 1.9%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 278 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 132 0.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 98 0.5%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 30 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

7748 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 26.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 2473 31.9%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 2256 29.1%
Availability 1248 16.1%
Speed 686 8.9%
Privacy 499 6.4%
Interference 375 4.8%
Equipment 211 2.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Open Internet/Net Neutrality, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

TV complaints

2465 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 8.4% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 980 39.8%
Availability 392 15.9%
Loud Commercials 353 14.3%
Indecency 283 11.5%
Equipment 269 10.9%
Interference 129 5.2%
Privacy 38 1.5%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 20 0.8%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Availability and Loud Commercials.

Radio complaints

809 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 2.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 559 69.1%
Availability 76 9.4%
Indecency 58 7.2%
Pirate Radio 49 6.1%
Equipment 30 3.7%
Commercials/Promotions 22 2.7%
Billing 14 1.7%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Emergency complaints

86 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Other 49 57.0%
Phone 18 20.9%
Tower 11 12.8%
Interference 8 9.3%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Other and Phone, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Accessibility complaints

48 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Closed Captioning on TV 26 54.2%
Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) 12 25.0%
Closed Captioning over the Internet 3 6.3%
Video Description 2 4.2%
Emergency Information on TV 1 2.1%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireless Phones 1 2.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Closed Captioning on TV and Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS), with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from November 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.