FCC Consumer Complaints – 23 November 2015

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 1071 consumer complaints on Monday, 23 November 2015 relating to telecommunications services, this represented an increase from the 419 complaints recorded the day before. The complaints came from 49 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints relating to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
1071
States & territories reporting
49
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (331)
Most reported state/territory
California (111)

Where the complaints came from

The 1071 complaints recorded on 23 November 2015 originated from 710 cities across 49 states and territories. Activity was spread across states and territories, with no single location accounting for a substantial share of complaints. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 111 10.4%
Florida 83 7.7%
Maryland 71 6.6%
New York 67 6.3%
Texas 60 5.6%
Pennsylvania 47 4.4%
Virginia 44 4.1%
Georgia 39 3.6%
Illinois 36 3.4%
New Jersey 34 3.2%
Other states and territories 477 44.5%

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 5 different complaint categories. Phone was the most reported category, with 736 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 736 68.7%
Internet 190 17.7%
TV 89 8.3%
Radio 52 4.9%
Emergency 4 0.4%

Phone complaints

736 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 68.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 331 45.0%
Robocalls 157 21.3%
Billing 82 11.1%
Equipment 34 4.6%
Availability (including rural call completion) 27 3.7%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 26 3.5%
Privacy 23 3.1%
Junk Faxes 15 2.0%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 15 2.0%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 14 1.9%
Interference (including signal jammers) 9 1.2%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 3 0.4%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Internet complaints

190 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 17.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 52 27.4%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 42 22.1%
Availability 39 20.5%
Speed 20 10.5%
Privacy 15 7.9%
Interference 12 6.3%
Equipment 10 5.3%

A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Open Internet/Net Neutrality and Availability among the most common.

TV complaints

89 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 8.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 38 42.7%
Availability 17 19.1%
Indecency 13 14.6%
Equipment 9 10.1%
Loud Commercials 7 7.9%
Interference 4 4.5%
Privacy 1 1.1%

Billing and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Radio complaints

52 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 4.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 45 86.5%
Availability 3 5.8%
Commercials/Promotions 2 3.8%
Indecency 1 1.9%
Pirate Radio 1 1.9%

Interference and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from 23 November 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.