FCC Consumer Complaints – 23 November 2019

Introduction

On Saturday, 23 November 2019, 331 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this was lower than the 950 complaints recorded the previous day. The complaints came from 43 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. The largest number of complaints related to Unwanted Calls, with 192 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
331
States & territories reporting
43
Most common issue
Unwanted Calls (192)
Most reported state/territory
California (47)

Where the complaints came from

On 23 November 2019, the 331 complaints recorded by the Federal Communications Commission were reported from 246 cities across 43 states and territories. Complaints were distributed across states and territories in a broadly even manner, with no individual location standing out significantly. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 47 14.2%
Florida 31 9.4%
Texas 26 7.9%
New York 20 6.0%
Arizona 14 4.2%
Nevada 13 3.9%
Pennsylvania 13 3.9%
Illinois 11 3.3%
Ohio 10 3.0%
Michigan 9 2.7%
Other states and territories 137 41.4%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 7 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 247 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 247 74.6%
Internet 47 14.2%
TV 28 8.5%
Accessibility 3 0.9%
Radio 3 0.9%
Request for Dispute Assistance 2 0.6%
Emergency 1 0.3%

Phone complaints

247 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 74.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 192 77.7%
Billing 23 9.3%
Equipment 11 4.5%
Availability (including rural call completion) 9 3.6%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 3 1.2%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 3 1.2%
Privacy 3 1.2%
Interference (including signal jammers) 2 0.8%
Junk Faxes 1 0.4%

Unwanted calls again accounted for the largest share of complaints in this category. These reports are examined in more detail in the section below. A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Equipment and Availability (including rural call completion) among the most common.

Internet complaints

47 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 14.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Availability 18 38.3%
Billing 16 34.0%
Speed 7 14.9%
Interference 3 6.4%
Equipment 2 4.3%
Privacy 1 2.1%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Availability and Billing, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Unwanted calls

192 complaints relating to unwanted calls were recorded on this date, accounting for 58% of all complaints. Reports referenced both caller ID numbers and business contact numbers, with number tables shown where meaningful patterns are present.

Most reported caller ID numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(954) 429-5750 5 2.6%
(352) 623-0643 2 1.0%
(425) 458-7671 2 1.0%
(475) 202-1986 2 1.0%
(516) 739-8540 2 1.0%
(608) 819-7658 2 1.0%
(715) 205-4652 2 1.0%
(201) 399-1459 1 0.5%
(201) 597-6168 1 0.5%
(202) 796-2151 1 0.5%

Key patterns

  • Prerecorded Voice was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • Reports were spread across many different business contact numbers, with no single number dominating.
  • (954) 429-5750 stood out as the most frequently reported caller ID number.
Page last updated: 24 November 2019 with FCC complaints data from 23 November 2019.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.