FCC Consumer Complaints – 6 September 2026

Introduction

On Sunday, 6 September 2026, 630 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented a decline from the 791 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 47 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Complaints relating to Billing were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
630
States & territories reporting
47
Most common issue
Billing (181)
Most reported state/territory
California (92)

Where the complaints came from

Across 419 cities in 47 states and territories, a total of 630 complaints were recorded on 6 September 2026. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below summarises the number of complaints reported in each state and territory on this date, ordered by total reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 92 14.6%
Texas 49 7.8%
Florida 46 7.3%
Pennsylvania 46 7.3%
North Carolina 24 3.8%
Washington 23 3.7%
New York 22 3.5%
New Jersey 21 3.3%
Michigan 20 3.2%
Georgia 18 2.9%
Other states and territories 269 42.7%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date were spread across 7 complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 432 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 432 68.6%
Internet 155 24.6%
TV 29 4.6%
Radio 6 1.0%
Emergency 4 0.6%
Accessibility 2 0.3%
Request for Dispute Assistance 2 0.3%

Phone complaints

432 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 68.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 175 40.5%
Billing 111 25.7%
Equipment 43 10.0%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 39 9.0%
Availability (including rural call completion) 27 6.3%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 17 3.9%
Interference (including signal jammers) 9 2.1%
Privacy 9 2.1%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 2 0.5%

As is typical for this category, unwanted calls accounted for the largest share of complaints. A more detailed analysis of these reports is provided in the section below. A broad mix of issues was reported in this category, with Billing, Equipment and Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) among the most common.

Internet complaints

155 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 24.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 63 40.6%
Availability 32 20.6%
Interference 20 12.9%
Equipment 18 11.6%
Speed 16 10.3%
Privacy 6 3.9%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Billing and Availability, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Unwanted calls

175 complaints relating to unwanted calls were recorded on this date, accounting for 27.8% of all complaints. Reports referenced both caller ID numbers and business contact numbers, with number tables shown where meaningful patterns are present.

Most reported business contact numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(309) 312-9642 5 2.9%
(830) 431-9830 4 2.3%
(866) 771-5820 4 2.3%
(217) 863-7161 2 1.1%
(855) 994-0589 2 1.1%
(201) 270-4995 1 0.6%
(201) 577-8956 1 0.6%
(202) 351-2704 1 0.6%
(210) 256-7825 1 0.6%
(217) 395-8017 1 0.6%

Key patterns

  • Other Services was reported slightly more often than other service types.
  • Live Voice was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • (309) 312-9642 was reported slightly more often than other business contact numbers.
  • Reports were spread across many different caller ID numbers, with no single number dominating.
Page last updated: 7 September 2026 with FCC complaints data from 6 September 2026.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.