FCC Consumer Complaints – 22 November 2025

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission recorded 676 consumer complaints on Saturday, 22 November 2025 relating to telecommunications services, this was lower than the 1123 complaints recorded the day before. Complaints were reported across 49 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Complaints relating to Unwanted Calls were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
676
States & territories reporting
49
Most common issue
Unwanted Calls (262)
Most reported state/territory
California (98)

Where the complaints came from

Across 476 cities in 49 states and territories, a total of 676 complaints were recorded on 22 November 2025. Activity was spread across states and territories, with no single location accounting for a substantial share of complaints. A similar pattern is observed at the city level, with complaints spread across locations rather than concentrated in a single area.

The distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints
California 98 14.5%
Florida 52 7.7%
New York 46 6.8%
Texas 38 5.6%
Georgia 36 5.3%
Illinois 33 4.9%
Virginia 32 4.7%
Arizona 29 4.3%
North Carolina 26 3.8%
Ohio 26 3.8%
Other states and territories 260 38.5%

What the complaints were about

Complaints recorded on this date related to 7 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 531 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 531 78.6%
Internet 105 15.5%
TV 28 4.1%
Radio 7 1.0%
Accessibility 3 0.4%
Emergency 1 0.1%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.1%

Phone complaints

531 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 78.6% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 262 49.3%
Billing 125 23.5%
Availability (including rural call completion) 43 8.1%
Equipment 40 7.5%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 26 4.9%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 20 3.8%
Privacy 8 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 4 0.8%
Junk Faxes 2 0.4%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.2%

Unwanted calls again accounted for the largest share of complaints in this category. These reports are examined in more detail in the section below. Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Availability (including rural call completion) and Equipment.

Internet complaints

105 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 15.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 40 38.1%
Availability 27 25.7%
Speed 14 13.3%
Interference 13 12.4%
Equipment 6 5.7%
Privacy 5 4.8%

Billing and Availability were the main issues reported in this category, while other issues were less common.

Unwanted calls

There were 262 complaints relating to unwanted calls on this date, representing 38.8% of all complaints. Caller ID and business contact number details are listed below where there is enough concentration to make the data meaningful.

Most reported business contact numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(934) 947-9605 6 2.3%
(833) 487-2707 5 1.9%
(833) 487-2706 2 0.8%
(833) 588-3818 2 0.8%
(202) 409-8779 1 0.4%
(202) 437-1670 1 0.4%
(206) 595-8461 1 0.4%
(206) 625-1067 1 0.4%
(239) 249-0307 1 0.4%
(251) 205-4833 1 0.4%

Key patterns

  • Other Services was reported slightly more often than other service types.
  • Live Voice was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • (934) 947-9605 was reported slightly more often than other business contact numbers.
  • Reports were spread across many different caller ID numbers, with no single number dominating.
Page last updated: 23 November 2025 with FCC complaints data from 22 November 2025.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.