FCC Consumer Complaints – 8 February 2026

Introduction

On Sunday, 8 February 2026, 400 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this was lower than the 671 complaints recorded the previous day. The complaints came from 50 states and territories, with California reporting a modestly higher count than the other locations. Complaints relating to Billing were marginally higher than for other issue types.

Key statistics

Total complaints
400
States & territories reporting
50
Most common issue
Billing (131)
Most reported state/territory
California (41)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 8 February 2026 show 400 complaints originating from 308 cities across 50 states and territories. Complaints were relatively evenly spread across states and territories, with no individual location contributing a dominant share. This pattern continues at the city level, where complaints were distributed across multiple locations without a single city standing out.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 41 10.3%
Texas 35 8.8%
New York 32 8.0%
Florida 27 6.8%
Tennessee 18 4.5%
North Carolina 16 4.0%
Georgia 15 3.8%
Pennsylvania 15 3.8%
Virginia 15 3.8%
Ohio 14 3.5%
Other states and territories 172 43.0%

What the complaints were about

A total of 7 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded on this date. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 262 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 262 65.5%
Internet 99 24.8%
TV 27 6.8%
Radio 5 1.3%
Accessibility 4 1.0%
Emergency 2 0.5%
Request for Dispute Assistance 1 0.3%

Phone complaints

262 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 65.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 85 32.4%
Unwanted Calls 78 29.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 36 13.7%
Equipment 35 13.4%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 17 6.5%
Privacy 6 2.3%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 3 1.1%
Interference (including signal jammers) 1 0.4%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 1 0.4%

Billing and Unwanted Calls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

99 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 24.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 41 41.4%
Availability 30 30.3%
Equipment 10 10.1%
Interference 9 9.1%
Speed 5 5.1%
Privacy 4 4.0%

Billing and Availability accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Unwanted calls

There were 78 complaints relating to unwanted calls on this date, representing 19.5% of all complaints. Caller ID and business contact number details are listed below where there is enough concentration to make the data meaningful.

Most reported business contact numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(877) 419-6664 7 9.0%
(888) 530-6830 2 2.6%
(202) 428-0230 1 1.3%
(205) 338-0336 1 1.3%
(213) 656-2505 1 1.3%
(229) 414-6960 1 1.3%
(315) 215-8043 1 1.3%
(315) 215-8045 1 1.3%
(320) 767-6514 1 1.3%
(475) 354-7102 1 1.3%

Key patterns

  • Other Services accounted for the largest share of unwanted call complaints by service type.
  • Text Message was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • (877) 419-6664 stood out as the most frequently reported business contact number.
  • Reports were spread across many different caller ID numbers, with no single number dominating.
Page last updated: 9 February 2026 with FCC complaints data from 8 February 2026.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.