FCC Consumer Complaints – 31 July 2026

Introduction

On 31 July 2026, 499 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, complaint volume fell from 1619 complaints the previous day. Complaints were reported across 47 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Unwanted Calls was reported slightly more frequently than other issues.

Key statistics

Total complaints
499
States & territories reporting
47
Most common issue
Unwanted Calls (196)
Most reported state/territory
California (76)

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded on 31 July 2026 show 499 complaints originating from 360 cities across 47 states and territories. Complaints were distributed across states and territories in a broadly even manner, with no individual location standing out significantly. At the city level, complaints were similarly dispersed, with no single location accounting for a notable share of the total.

The table below shows the distribution of complaints by state and territory for this date, highlighting the locations with the highest number of reports.

State/Territory Complaints
California 76 15.2%
Florida 44 8.8%
Texas 31 6.2%
Washington 27 5.4%
New York 26 5.2%
Pennsylvania 23 4.6%
New Jersey 21 4.2%
Illinois 20 4.0%
Ohio 20 4.0%
North Carolina 16 3.2%
Other states and territories 195 39.1%

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded on this date fell into 6 different complaint categories. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 395 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 395 79.2%
Internet 65 13.0%
TV 26 5.2%
Radio 5 1.0%
Emergency 4 0.8%
Request for Dispute Assistance 4 0.8%

Phone complaints

395 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 79.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Unwanted Calls 196 49.6%
Billing 96 24.3%
Equipment 27 6.8%
Availability (including rural call completion) 25 6.3%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 16 4.1%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 11 2.8%
Privacy 10 2.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 5 1.3%
Junk Faxes 4 1.0%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 4 1.0%

As is often the case in this category, unwanted calls were the most frequently reported issue. Further analysis of these complaints is provided below. The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Equipment and Availability (including rural call completion).

Internet complaints

65 complaints were recorded in this category, representing 13.0% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 27 41.5%
Interference 10 15.4%
Speed 9 13.8%
Availability 8 12.3%
Equipment 6 9.2%
Privacy 5 7.7%

Billing was the most commonly reported issue in this category, while other issues occurred less frequently.

Unwanted calls

There were 196 complaints relating to unwanted calls on this date, representing 39.3% of all complaints. Caller ID and business contact number details are listed below where there is enough concentration to make the data meaningful.

Most reported business contact numbers

Telephone number Complaints Share
(369) 216-6437 9 4.6%
(309) 301-1881 5 2.6%
(217) 394-8983 2 1.0%
(360) 417-2062 2 1.0%
(844) 515-1847 2 1.0%
(201) 586-1315 1 0.5%
(202) 935-1472 1 0.5%
(203) 539-0150 1 0.5%
(206) 929-0460 1 0.5%
(207) 204-5129 1 0.5%

Key patterns

  • Other Services was reported slightly more often than other service types.
  • Prerecorded Voice was reported slightly more often than other call types.
  • (369) 216-6437 was reported slightly more often than other business contact numbers.
  • Reports were spread across many different caller ID numbers, with no single number dominating.
Page last updated: 1 August 2026 with FCC complaints data from 31 July 2026.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.