FCC Consumer Complaints – February 2015

Introduction

In February 2015, 21712 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services were recorded in the Federal Communications Commission system, this represented a decline from the 23955 complaints recorded the month before. Complaints were reported across 55 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. Complaints were most commonly associated with Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), accounting for 8527 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
21712
Days with complaint data
28
Days with complaints
28
States & territories reporting
55
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (8527)
Most reported state/territory
California (2760)

Daily complaint activity

Daily complaint activity averaged 775.4 complaints per day during the month. The busiest day was 18 February 2015, when 1142 complaints were recorded, and 18 days were above the monthly daily average. The quietest day was 8 February 2015, with 239 complaints, noticeably below the monthly average.

Each bar represents one day of the month. Taller bars indicate more complaints.

Where the complaints came from

A total of 21712 complaints were recorded in February 2015, with reports originating from 5179 cities in 55 states and territories. Complaint activity was fairly evenly distributed, with no single state or territory accounting for a large share of reports. At the city level, a significant concentration was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 99 of the 101 complaints recorded.

The monthly distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints Share
California 2760 12.7%
Florida 1594 7.3%
Texas 1592 7.3%
New York 1239 5.7%
Pennsylvania 940 4.3%
Illinois 922 4.2%
Georgia 736 3.4%
New Jersey 717 3.3%
Michigan 662 3.0%
Virginia 629 2.9%
Other states and territories 9908 45.6%

Location highlights

  • All complaints reported in District of Columbia originated from a single city, Washington.
  • Nearly all complaints reported in District of Columbia originated from Washington.

What the complaints were about

A total of 7 complaint categories were represented in the complaints recorded during the month. The largest number of complaints fell within Phone, which accounted for 16042 reports. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 16042 73.9%
Internet 2592 11.9%
TV 2549 11.7%
Radio 368 1.7%
Accessibility 116 0.5%
Emergency 40 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 5 0.0%

Phone complaints

16042 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 73.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 8527 53.2%
Robocalls 3195 19.9%
Billing 1503 9.4%
Equipment 490 3.1%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 474 3.0%
Privacy 440 2.7%
Availability (including rural call completion) 433 2.7%
Junk Faxes 399 2.5%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 315 2.0%
Interference (including signal jammers) 225 1.4%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 27 0.2%

Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Internet complaints

2592 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 11.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 712 27.5%
Privacy 497 19.2%
Speed 453 17.5%
Availability 448 17.3%
Interference 340 13.1%
Equipment 141 5.4%

Complaints in this category covered a range of issues, including Billing, Privacy and Speed.

TV complaints

2549 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 11.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Indecency 899 35.3%
Billing 742 29.1%
Availability 287 11.3%
Loud Commercials 280 11.0%
Equipment 207 8.1%
Interference 89 3.5%
Privacy 44 1.7%

Indecency and Billing accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Radio complaints

368 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 1.7% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 179 48.6%
Indecency 99 26.9%
Pirate Radio 31 8.4%
Equipment 24 6.5%
Availability 22 6.0%
Billing 12 3.3%

Interference and Indecency accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Accessibility complaints

116 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) 64 55.2%
Closed Captioning on TV 23 19.8%
Closed Captioning over the Internet 11 9.5%
Video Description 7 6.0%
Emergency Information on TV 3 2.6%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireless Phones 3 2.6%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireline Phones 1 0.9%

Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) and Closed Captioning on TV accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Emergency complaints

40 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Phone 19 47.5%
Other 18 45.0%
Tower 3 7.5%

Phone and Other accounted for the majority of complaints in this category, with other issues reported less frequently.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from February 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.