FCC Consumer Complaints – June 2015

Introduction

In June 2015, the Federal Communications Commission recorded 29751 consumer complaints relating to telecommunications services, this was higher than the 22543 complaints recorded the previous month. Complaints were reported across 55 states and territories, with California slightly ahead of the other locations. The most common issue reported was Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing), accounting for 10443 complaints.

Key statistics

Total complaints
29751
Days with complaint data
30
Days with complaints
30
States & territories reporting
55
Most common issue
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) (10443)
Most reported state/territory
California (3698)

Daily complaint activity

Across the month, the FCC recorded an average of 991.7 complaints per day. The highest daily total was 2047 complaints on 25 June 2015, while 18 days recorded more complaints than the monthly daily average. The quietest day was 7 June 2015, with 242 complaints, noticeably below the monthly average.

Each bar represents one day of the month. Taller bars indicate more complaints.

Where the complaints came from

Reports recorded in June 2015 show 29751 complaints originating from 6079 cities across 55 states and territories. Complaint activity was fairly evenly distributed, with no single state or territory accounting for a large share of reports. Despite the overall distribution, a notable concentration at the city level was observed in District of Columbia, where Washington accounted for 138 of the 145 complaints recorded in the state.

The monthly distribution of complaints by state and territory is shown below, with locations ranked by the number of reports recorded.

State/Territory Complaints Share
California 3698 12.4%
Florida 2286 7.7%
Texas 2056 6.9%
New York 1697 5.7%
Pennsylvania 1324 4.5%
Georgia 1266 4.3%
Illinois 1099 3.7%
Virginia 989 3.3%
New Jersey 948 3.2%
Maryland 935 3.1%
Other states and territories 13372 44.9%

Location highlight

Washington accounted for nearly all complaints recorded in District of Columbia.

What the complaints were about

The complaints recorded during the month fell into 7 different complaint categories. Phone accounted for the largest share, with 21270 complaints. Complaint activity was strongly concentrated in this category, with other categories contributing comparatively fewer reports.

Complaint category Complaints Share
Phone 21270 71.5%
Internet 5149 17.3%
TV 2653 8.9%
Radio 547 1.8%
Emergency 62 0.2%
Accessibility 54 0.2%
Request for Dispute Assistance 16 0.1%

Phone complaints

21270 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 71.5% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) 10443 49.1%
Robocalls 4355 20.5%
Billing 2313 10.9%
Availability (including rural call completion) 875 4.1%
Equipment 665 3.1%
Number Portability (keeping your number if you change providers) 616 2.9%
Privacy 538 2.5%
Junk Faxes 431 2.0%
Cramming (unauthorized charges on your phone bill) 372 1.7%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 314 1.5%
Interference (including signal jammers) 269 1.3%
Slamming (change of your carrier without permission) 52 0.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Telemarketing (including do not call and spoofing) and Robocalls, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Internet complaints

5149 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 17.3% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 1461 28.4%
Speed 1172 22.8%
Availability 835 16.2%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 635 12.3%
Privacy 459 8.9%
Interference 332 6.4%
Equipment 247 4.8%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Billing, Speed and Availability.

TV complaints

2653 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 8.9% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Billing 1065 40.1%
Availability 436 16.4%
Loud Commercials 325 12.3%
Indecency 304 11.5%
Equipment 287 10.8%
Interference 148 5.6%
Privacy 60 2.3%
Open Internet/Net Neutrality 19 0.7%

Billing was the most commonly reported issue in this category, while other issues occurred less frequently.

Radio complaints

547 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 1.8% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Interference 304 55.6%
Indecency 113 20.7%
Pirate Radio 46 8.4%
Availability 29 5.3%
Equipment 21 3.8%
Commercials/Promotions 19 3.5%
Billing 12 2.2%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Interference and Indecency, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Emergency complaints

62 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Other 26 41.9%
Interference 20 32.3%
Phone 13 21.0%
Tower 3 4.8%

The largest share of complaints in this category related to Other and Interference, with fewer reports falling into other issue types.

Accessibility complaints

54 complaints were recorded in this category during the month, representing 0.2% of the total.

Issue Complaints Share
Closed Captioning on TV 19 35.2%
Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) 11 20.4%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireline Phones 8 14.8%
Closed Captioning over the Internet 7 13.0%
Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireless Phones 3 5.6%
Video Description 2 3.7%
Emergency Information on TV 1 1.9%

The remaining complaints in this category were spread across several issues, including Closed Captioning on TV, Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) and Hearing Aid Compatibility of Wireline Phones.

Page last updated: 10 December 2018 with FCC complaints data from June 2015.

The information presented on this page is based on consumer complaint data submitted to regulatory authorities. References to telephone numbers reflect reports made by consumers and do not confirm ownership, authenticity, or that the number was genuinely associated with the call. Caller ID information may be inaccurate or subject to spoofing.

Complaint categories, dates and complainant locations are based on the source records and may contain incomplete, approximate or user-entered information. Location details refer to the complainant’s reported location, not the location of the caller or telephone number. This content is provided for informational purposes only.